Summary to follow. 6 syllabus statements · 23 questions · about twenty minutes.
Compiled from the IB Physics guide (first assessment 2025, updated November 2023) and our question bank ·
Specialist review in progress
· How these pages are made
Assessed in Paper 1A (multiple choice), Paper 1B (data-based) and Paper 2 (short and extended response). IB Physics guide (first assessment 2025, updated November 2023).
Learn
In preparation: 0 of 6 sections compiled and reviewed. The rest show key terms and common misconceptions from our question bank until they are.
Magnetic flux Φ HL
Magnetic flux Φ
The magnetic flux through a flat surface of area A in a uniform magnetic field of strength B is Φ = BA cos θ, where θ is the angle between the field and the normal (the line perpendicular) to the surface. Flux is a scalar measured in webers (Wb). It is greatest, BA, when the field passes straight through the surface (θ = 0°) and zero when the field lines run parallel to the surface (θ = 90°). For a coil of N turns, Φ is the flux through one turn.
Weber (Wb)
The SI unit of magnetic flux: 1 Wb = 1 T m². A uniform field of 1 T passing perpendicularly through an area of 1 m² gives a flux of 1 Wb. Because Φ = BA cos θ, the magnetic field strength B can also be described as flux per unit area, in Wb m⁻², which is the same as the tesla.
The angle θ in Φ = BA cos θ
θ is measured between the magnetic field and the NORMAL to the surface, not between the field and the plane of the surface. When the plane of a coil is perpendicular to the field, θ = 0° and Φ = BA; when the plane is parallel to the field, θ = 90° and Φ = 0. A coil whose plane makes an angle α with the field lines has θ = 90° − α.
Students often think The angle θ in Φ = BA cos θ is the angle between the field lines and the plane (face) of the coil. In fact No. θ is the angle between the field and the normal to the coil. The flux is greatest (BA) when the plane of the coil is perpendicular to the field and zero when the plane is parallel to it.
Students often think The flux through a coil is BA whatever the orientation of the coil, because B and A do not change when the coil is tilted. In fact No. Φ = BA only when the field is perpendicular to the plane of the coil. In general Φ = BA cos θ, which is smaller when the coil is tilted and zero when its plane is parallel to the field.
Induced emf ε HL
Induced emf ε
An emf (electromotive force, measured in volts) produced in a conductor when the magnetic flux linked with it changes. The emf is the energy transferred to each coulomb of charge that moves round the circuit, so it exists whether or not the circuit is complete; a current flows only when there is a complete circuit. Examples include a stationary coil in a time-varying magnetic field, a coil rotating in a uniform field, and relative motion between a conductor and a field, such as a magnet oscillating on a spring above a coil or a coil moved into or out of a field.
Faraday's law of induction
The emf induced in a coil of N turns equals the rate of change of magnetic flux through it multiplied by N: ε = −N ΔΦ/Δt. The size of the emf depends on how FAST the flux changes, not on how much flux there is: a large steady flux induces no emf, and the same change of flux produces twice the emf if it happens in half the time. The minus sign expresses Lenz's law: the emf acts to oppose the change of flux.
Number of turns N
In ε = −N ΔΦ/Δt, Φ is the flux through ONE turn. Each turn has the same emf induced in it, and because the turns are connected in series their emfs add, so a coil of N turns has N times the emf of a single turn. The flux itself does not depend on N.
Students often think The induced emf depends on how much magnetic flux passes through the coil: the more flux there is, the bigger the emf. In fact No. It depends on the rate of change of flux, ε = −N ΔΦ/Δt. A large steady flux gives no emf, and the emf can be greatest at the instant the flux is zero, if the flux is changing fastest then.
Students often think The induced emf equals the change in flux (times N), so the same change of flux always induces the same emf, however quickly or slowly it happens. In fact No. The emf is the change in flux divided by the time taken (times N). The same change of flux made in half the time induces twice the emf.
Motional emf ε = BvL HL
Motional emf ε = BvL
When a straight conductor of length L moves with speed v perpendicular to its own length and to a uniform magnetic field B, an emf ε = BvL is induced between its ends. The magnetic force on the free electrons pushes them towards one end until the resulting electric field balances the magnetic force. BvL is the flux swept out per second (the area swept per second, vL, multiplied by B), so it agrees with Faraday's law. No emf is induced if the conductor moves parallel to the field lines or along its own length.
Rectangular coil entering or leaving a field
A rectangular coil of N turns moving at speed v into a uniform field perpendicular to its plane has emf ε = NBvL while it is entering, where L is the length of the leading side: only the leading side cuts field lines (the trailing side is still outside the field; the sides parallel to the motion move along their own length). The flux through the coil rises steadily, so the emf is constant. While the coil is wholly inside a uniform field the flux is constant and the emf is zero; while it leaves, the flux falls and the emf has the same size but the opposite direction.
Students often think Any motion of a conductor inside a magnetic field induces an emf in it, whatever the direction of motion. In fact No. An emf is induced only if the motion changes the flux linked with the conductor, which for a straight conductor means moving across the field lines. A conductor moving parallel to the field, or a closed coil moving wholly inside a uniform field, has no emf.
Students often think An emf is induced only when the conductor is part of a complete circuit; with the ends unconnected there is no emf. In fact Yes. The emf is induced whether or not the circuit is complete; what needs a complete circuit is a current. A rod moving across a field with its ends unconnected has an emf BvL between its ends but carries no current.
Lenz's law HL
Lenz's law
The direction of an induced emf is such that any current it drives produces effects that oppose the change of flux that caused it. When a magnet approaches a coil, the induced current makes the near end of the coil a like pole, which repels the magnet; when the magnet moves away, the near end becomes an unlike pole, which attracts it. In both cases the coil opposes the relative motion, not the magnet's field itself.
Lenz's law as a consequence of energy conservation
An induced current transfers energy, for example to the internal energy of a resistor. That energy must be supplied by work done against the magnetic force that the induced current produces. If the induced current instead aided the change, the magnet or conductor would speed up and the current would grow with no work done, creating energy from nothing. Conservation of energy therefore requires the induced current to oppose the change.
Induced currents in solid conductors
Relative motion between a magnet and any conducting material (for example a copper tube or aluminium plate) induces currents that circulate within the conductor. By Lenz's law these currents exert forces that oppose the relative motion, so a magnet falling down a copper tube falls more slowly than in free fall, and the lost gravitational potential energy becomes internal energy of the tube. The conductor need not be magnetic.
Self-induction (qualitative)
A changing current in a coil changes the magnetic flux through that same coil, so an emf is induced in the coil itself. By Lenz's law this self-induced emf opposes the change in current: it acts against the current while the current is increasing and in the same direction as the current while it is decreasing.
Students often think Lenz's law means the induced current always produces a field opposite to the magnet's field, so the coil always repels the magnet. In fact No. The induced current opposes the CHANGE in flux. When the flux is increasing the induced field is opposite to the external field (repelling an approaching magnet); when the flux is decreasing the induced field is in the same direction as the external field (attracting a receding magnet).
Students often think The induced current helps the motion that produces it: a coil pulls an approaching magnet in and so speeds it up. In fact No. If the induced current aided the change, the magnet would speed up and the current would grow without any work being done, which would create energy. Energy conservation requires the induced current to oppose the change.
Sinusoidal emf of a rotating coil HL
Sinusoidal emf of a rotating coil
A flat coil rotating at constant frequency about an axis perpendicular to a uniform magnetic field has a flux through it that varies sinusoidally with time, so the induced emf also varies sinusoidally. The emf is zero when the plane of the coil is perpendicular to the field (flux greatest, momentarily not changing) and greatest when the plane is parallel to the field (flux zero, changing fastest). The emf reverses direction every half revolution, so it completes one cycle per revolution.
Peak emf of a rotating rectangular coil
At the instant the plane of a rotating rectangular coil is parallel to the field, its two sides parallel to the axis move perpendicular to the field. Each side, of length L, moves at speed v = 2πfr, where r is its distance from the axis, and has emf BvL; the two sides move in opposite directions, so their emfs add around the loop. For N turns the peak emf is 2NBvL. The other two sides move so that no emf acts along them.
Students often think A coil turning at a steady rate in a uniform field produces an emf of constant size, because nothing about the motion changes. In fact No. Although the coil turns steadily, the rate at which its flux changes varies with its position, so the emf varies sinusoidally: zero when the plane is perpendicular to the field and greatest when it is parallel.
Students often think The speed of a side of a rotating coil is its frequency multiplied by its distance from the axis, v = fr. In fact No. A point at distance r from the axis travels a circumference 2πr in each revolution, so v = 2πfr = ωr. Using v = fr gives a speed 2π times too small.
Effect of the frequency of rotation HL
Effect of the frequency of rotation
Increasing the frequency of rotation f of a coil in a uniform field increases the rate at which the flux changes, so the peak emf is proportional to f: doubling f doubles the peak emf. The emf completes one cycle per revolution, so its frequency equals f and its time period is T = 1/f: doubling f also halves the time period. On an emf–time graph a higher frequency gives taller peaks that are closer together.
Students often think Rotating the coil faster only makes the emf alternate more often; the peak emf depends only on N, B and the area of the coil, so it is unchanged. In fact Yes. The peak emf is proportional to the frequency of rotation: at twice the frequency the flux changes by the same amount in half the time, so the peak emf doubles.
Students often think Frequency and time period change in the same way, so increasing the frequency of rotation increases the time period of the emf in proportion. In fact No. The time period is T = 1/f, so it is inversely proportional to the frequency: increasing f makes T shorter.
Diagnostic a bearings check, not a test
10 questions, one per part of the topic where we can. Answer them, then see which statements you own and which to read.
1 A flat loop of wire is placed in a uniform magnetic field. In which situation is the magnetic flux through the loop zero? HL
Answer and reasoning
Its plane is perpendicular to the field lines, so θ in Φ = BA cos θ is 90°. — A student who measures θ from the plane picks this. With the plane perpendicular to the field, the field passes straight through the loop: the angle to the normal is 0° and the flux is greatest, BA.
It is held at rest in the field, so the field through it is not changing. — A student who links flux to motion or change picks this. A loop at rest in a steady field has a constant, non-zero flux, Φ = BA cos θ. What is zero is the RATE of change of flux, and so the induced emf.
Its plane is parallel to the field lines, so no field lines pass through the loop. — Φ = BA cos θ, with θ measured from the normal. When the plane of the loop is parallel to the field, the normal is perpendicular to it, θ = 90° and cos θ = 0, so Φ = 0: the field lines run alongside the loop and none pass through it.
At no orientation: while a loop is inside a field, flux must pass through it. — A student who treats flux as the same as the field picks this. Flux also depends on orientation: Φ = BA cos θ is zero when the plane of the loop is parallel to the field, even though the field is still present.
2 According to Faraday's law of induction, the magnitude of the emf induced in a coil with a fixed number of turns is proportional to which quantity? HL
Answer and reasoning
The rate at which the magnetic flux through the coil changes — Faraday's law is ε = −N ΔΦ/Δt: for a fixed number of turns the size of the emf is proportional to ΔΦ/Δt, the rate of change of flux. How much flux there is, or how strong the field is, does not matter if the flux is not changing.
The magnetic flux passing through the coil at that instant — A student who thinks the emf depends on the amount of flux picks this. A coil can have a large steady flux and no emf at all; the emf depends on how fast the flux is changing.
The change in magnetic flux, whatever time it takes — A student who leaves out the Δt picks this. The same change of flux made in half the time induces twice the emf, so the emf is proportional to ΔΦ/Δt, not to ΔΦ alone.
The speed of the coil relative to the magnet producing the field — A student who thinks induction needs motion picks this. A stationary coil in a field whose strength is changing, for example inside a solenoid with a changing current, has an emf induced in it with nothing moving; the emf depends on the rate of change of flux, however that change is produced.
3 A straight copper rod is held horizontal and at right angles to a uniform horizontal magnetic field. The ends of the rod are not connected to anything. In which case is an emf induced between the ends of the rod? HL
Answer and reasoning
The rod moves horizontally in the same direction as the field lines. — A student who thinks any motion in a field induces an emf picks this. Moving along the field lines, the rod sweeps across no field lines, so no emf is induced.
The rod slides horizontally along the direction of its own length. — A student who thinks moving at right angles to the field is enough picks this. Sliding along its own length, the rod sweeps out no area and cuts no flux; the magnetic force on its electrons acts across the rod, not along it, so no emf appears between the ends.
The rod is held at rest while the magnetic field is kept steady. — A student who thinks a field alone induces an emf picks this. With the rod at rest in a steady field, no flux changes, so no emf is induced however strong the field is.
The rod moves vertically upwards at a steady speed while staying horizontal. — Moving vertically, the rod moves perpendicular to its own length and to the horizontal field, so it sweeps across field lines and ε = BvL is induced between its ends. No complete circuit is needed for an emf; without one, there is simply no current.
4 The north pole of a bar magnet is pushed at a steady speed into a coil that is connected to a resistor, and the resistor warms up. Where does the energy transferred to the resistor come from? HL
Answer and reasoning
The magnet's store of magnetism, which is gradually used up by the induced current it produces — A student who thinks the magnet is an energy store that runs down picks this. The magnet can be used indefinitely; the energy comes from the work done moving it against the force that the induced current produces.
Work done by the person pushing the magnet against the opposing force from the coil — By Lenz's law the induced current makes the coil repel the approaching magnet. The person must do work against this force, and that work is transferred by the induced current to the internal energy of the resistor. This is why Lenz's law follows from energy conservation.
The coil's attraction of the magnet, which pulls it in and does work on it — A student who thinks the induced current helps the motion picks this. If the coil attracted the magnet, both the magnet's kinetic energy and the current would grow with no work done, creating energy. The coil repels the approaching magnet.
The changing flux itself, so the magnet is no harder to push in when the coil is connected — A student who thinks induction makes electrical energy without extra work picks this. With the coil connected, the induced current makes the coil repel the magnet, so the person must push harder than for an unconnected coil; that extra work is the energy that warms the resistor.
5 A flat rectangular coil rotates at a constant frequency about an axis that lies in its own plane and is perpendicular to a uniform magnetic field. How does the magnitude of the induced emf depend on the position of the coil? HL
Answer and reasoning
It is greatest when the coil's plane is perpendicular to the field, where the flux through it is greatest. — A student who thinks the emf follows the amount of flux picks this. When the plane is perpendicular to the field the flux is greatest but momentarily not changing, so the emf is zero at that position.
It is the same at every position, because the coil turns at a steady rate in a uniform field. — A student who expects steady motion to give a steady emf picks this. The sides move at constant speed, but the component of their velocity across the field varies through each turn, so the emf varies sinusoidally.
It is greatest when the plane of the coil is parallel to the field, where the flux is zero. — The flux Φ = BA cos θ varies sinusoidally, and the emf depends on how fast Φ changes. The cosine changes fastest where it passes through zero, so the emf is greatest when the plane is parallel to the field and the flux is zero; the long sides then move straight across the field lines.
It is zero at every position, because the field through the coil is uniform and does not change. — A student who treats flux as the same as field picks this. B is constant, but the angle between the field and the coil changes as it rotates, so Φ = BA cos θ changes and an emf is induced.
6 A coil rotating at 50 revolutions per second in a uniform magnetic field produces an alternating emf with a time period of 20 ms. The rotation rate is then changed to 1800 revolutions per minute. What is the new time period of the emf? HL
Answer and reasoning
3.3 × 10⁻² s — 1800 rev min⁻¹ ÷ 60 = 30 revolutions per second. The emf completes one cycle per revolution, so its period is T = 1/f = 1/30 s = 3.3 × 10⁻² s: a lower rotation frequency gives a longer period.
1.2 × 10⁻² s — A student who scales the period in the same way as the frequency gets 20 ms × 30/50 = 12 ms. T = 1/f, so reducing the frequency from 50 Hz to 30 Hz INCREASES the period.
2.0 × 10⁻² s — A student who thinks changing the rotation frequency changes only the size of the emf keeps 20 ms. The emf repeats once per revolution, so its period changes whenever the rotation rate changes.
5.6 × 10⁻⁴ s — A student who uses 1800 as the frequency in hertz gets T = 1/1800 s = 5.6 × 10⁻⁴ s. Revolutions per minute must be divided by 60: f = 30 Hz.
Working f = 1800 rev min⁻¹ / 60 s min⁻¹ = 30 Hz. The emf completes one cycle per revolution, so T = 1/f = 1/(30 Hz) = 0.0333 s = 3.3 × 10⁻² s.
7 A flat rectangular loop of wire measures 4.0 cm by 5.0 cm. It is placed in a uniform magnetic field of strength 0.30 T, with the plane of the loop at an angle of 30° to the field lines. What is the magnetic flux through the loop? HL
Answer and reasoning
5.2 × 10⁻⁴ Wb — A student who measures θ from the plane of the loop uses cos 30°: 0.30 × 2.0 × 10⁻³ × 0.866 = 5.2 × 10⁻⁴ Wb. θ in Φ = BA cos θ is measured from the normal, so here θ = 90° − 30° = 60°.
6.0 × 10⁻⁴ Wb — A student who uses Φ = BA whatever the orientation gets 0.30 × 2.0 × 10⁻³ = 6.0 × 10⁻⁴ Wb. That is the flux only when the field passes straight through the loop; tilted at 30° to the field, the loop has Φ = BA cos 60°.
3.0 × 10⁻² Wb — A student who converts 20 cm² to m² by dividing by 100 uses A = 0.20 m² and gets 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.5 = 3.0 × 10⁻² Wb. 1 m² = 10⁴ cm², so A = 2.0 × 10⁻³ m².
3.0 × 10⁻⁴ Wb — A = 0.040 m × 0.050 m = 2.0 × 10⁻³ m². The plane is at 30° to the field, so the normal is at θ = 60° to the field. Φ = BA cos θ = 0.30 × 2.0 × 10⁻³ × cos 60° = 3.0 × 10⁻⁴ Wb.
Working A = 0.040 m × 0.050 m = 2.0 × 10⁻³ m². The angle between the field and the plane is 30°, so the angle between the field and the normal is θ = 60°. Φ = BA cos θ = (0.30 T)(2.0 × 10⁻³ m²)(cos 60°) = (0.30)(2.0 × 10⁻³)(0.50) = 3.0 × 10⁻⁴ Wb.
8 A flat rectangular coil of 100 turns measures 4.0 cm by 5.0 cm. It starts with its plane perpendicular to a uniform magnetic field of strength 0.40 T and is then rotated through 60° in 0.050 s, about an axis perpendicular to the field. What is the magnitude of the average emf induced during the rotation? HL
Answer and reasoning
1.4 V — A student who measures θ from the plane takes the starting flux as BA cos 90° = 0 and the final flux as BA cos 30°, so ΔΦ = 0.866BA and ε = 1.4 V. The plane starts perpendicular to the field, so the flux starts at its maximum, BA.
0.80 V — At the start θ = 0° (field along the normal), so Φ₁ = BA. After turning 60°, θ = 60°, so Φ₂ = BA cos 60° = 0.5BA. ΔΦ = 0.5 × 0.40 × 2.0 × 10⁻³ = 4.0 × 10⁻⁴ Wb. ε = NΔΦ/Δt = 100 × 4.0 × 10⁻⁴ / 0.050 = 0.80 V.
0.040 V — A student who stops at NΔΦ gets 100 × 4.0 × 10⁻⁴ = 0.040, which is in webers, not volts. Faraday's law needs the RATE of change: divide by the 0.050 s taken.
0.0080 V — A student who leaves out the number of turns finds the emf of one turn: 4.0 × 10⁻⁴ / 0.050 = 0.0080 V. Each of the 100 turns has this emf and they are in series, so ε = 0.80 V.
Working A = 0.040 m × 0.050 m = 2.0 × 10⁻³ m². Initially the plane is perpendicular to the field, so θ = 0° and Φ₁ = BA = (0.40 T)(2.0 × 10⁻³ m²) = 8.0 × 10⁻⁴ Wb. After rotating 60°, θ = 60° and Φ₂ = BA cos 60° = 4.0 × 10⁻⁴ Wb. ΔΦ = 4.0 × 10⁻⁴ Wb. Average ε = N ΔΦ/Δt = 100 × (4.0 × 10⁻⁴ Wb)/(0.050 s) = 0.80 V.
9 A metal rod 0.40 m long rests across two parallel horizontal rails 0.40 m apart, which are joined at one end by a resistor. A uniform vertical magnetic field of strength 150 mT acts over the whole arrangement. The rod moves along the rails at constant velocity, away from the resistor, so that it travels 1.0 m in the next 0.50 s. At the instant considered it is 0.15 m from the resistor. What is the emf induced in the rod? HL
Answer and reasoning
0.0090 V — A student who thinks the emf equals the flux through the circuit uses BA = 0.150 × 0.40 × 0.15 = 0.0090, which is a flux in webers. The emf depends on how fast the flux changes, BvL, not on the flux at that instant.
0.060 V — A student who uses the change of flux without dividing by the time finds the flux swept in 0.50 s: 0.150 × 0.40 × 1.0 = 0.060 Wb. Dividing by 0.50 s gives the emf, 0.12 V.
120 V — A student who substitutes 150 for the field, without converting mT to T, gets 150 × 2.0 × 0.40 = 120 V. B = 150 mT = 0.150 T, and the emf is 0.12 V.
0.12 V — v = 1.0 m / 0.50 s = 2.0 m s⁻¹. The rod, the field and the velocity are mutually perpendicular, so ε = BvL = 0.150 × 2.0 × 0.40 = 0.12 V. The rod's distance from the resistor does not affect the emf.
Working v = 1.0 m / 0.50 s = 2.0 m s⁻¹. B = 150 mT = 0.150 T. The rod (L = 0.40 m), its velocity and the field are mutually perpendicular, so ε = BvL = (0.150 T)(2.0 m s⁻¹)(0.40 m) = 0.12 V.
10 A strong bar magnet is released from rest and falls vertically down the centre of a long vertical copper tube. How does its fall compare with a fall from rest through the same height in air outside the tube? HL
Answer and reasoning
It falls more slowly, because currents induced in the tube exert forces that oppose its motion. — The moving magnet changes the flux through each ring of the tube, inducing circulating currents. By Lenz's law these currents oppose the relative motion, so the magnet falls more slowly and soon reaches a low terminal speed; its lost gravitational potential energy becomes internal energy of the tube.
It falls in the same way, because copper is not magnetic and so exerts no force on it. — A student who thinks non-magnetic metals are unaffected picks this. Copper is not attracted by a stationary magnet, but a moving magnet induces currents in it, and these currents exert forces that oppose the motion.
It falls faster, because the currents induced in the tube pull it downwards. — A student who thinks induced currents help the change picks this. A downward pull would increase both the magnet's kinetic energy and the induced currents with no extra work done, violating energy conservation. The force opposes the motion.
It is pulled sideways onto the wall and sticks there, as a magnet attracts metals. — A student who thinks magnets attract all metals picks this. Copper is not ferromagnetic, so the magnet is not attracted to the wall; its interaction with the tube arises only from induced currents while it moves.
Read the ones marked not yet in Learn, then Verify.
Verify confirm before you go
13 more questions. Every wrong answer here is a real misconception, and you see why it is wrong straight away.
1 A small flat coil is held at rest inside a long solenoid, with its plane perpendicular to the solenoid's axis. The magnetic field in the solenoid is proportional to the current in it. The current rises steadily from 0 to 2.0 A between t = 0 and t = 4.0 s, stays at 2.0 A until t = 8.0 s, and then falls steadily to zero by t = 10.0 s. Which describes the emf induced in the small coil? HL
Answer and reasoning
Constant from 0 to 4 s, zero from 4 to 8 s, then reversed and larger in size from 8 to 10 s — The flux through the small coil follows the current. From 0 to 4 s it rises at a steady rate, giving a constant emf; from 4 to 8 s it is steady, so the emf is zero; from 8 to 10 s it falls by the same amount in half the time, so the emf is reversed and larger in size (twice as large).
Constant from 0 to 4 s, zero from 4 to 8 s, then reversed but the same size from 8 to 10 s — A student who thinks the emf depends only on the change of flux reasons that the rise and the fall are the same change, so the emfs match. The fall happens in 2 s rather than 4 s, so the flux changes twice as fast and the emf is larger.
Rising from 0 to 4 s, steady at its largest from 4 to 8 s, then falling to zero from 8 to 10 s — A student who thinks the emf follows the amount of flux describes the flux, not the emf. While the current is steady at 2.0 A the flux is largest but unchanging, so the emf is zero.
Zero throughout, because the small coil is at rest and nothing moves relative to it — A student who thinks an emf needs motion picks this. The field of the solenoid changes with its current, so the flux through the stationary coil changes and an emf is induced: a time-varying field needs no motion.
Working The flux through the small coil is proportional to the solenoid current, so the emf is proportional to the rate of change of current. 0 to 4.0 s: ΔI/Δt = (2.0 A)/(4.0 s) = +0.50 A s⁻¹, constant, so the emf is constant. 4.0 s to 8.0 s: ΔI/Δt = 0, so the emf is zero. 8.0 s to 10.0 s: ΔI/Δt = (−2.0 A)/(2.0 s) = −1.0 A s⁻¹, so the emf is reversed and twice the size it was from 0 to 4.0 s.
2 A flat square coil connected to a data logger moves at constant velocity, with its plane perpendicular to a uniform magnetic field. It starts outside the field, passes into it, crosses it and leaves on the far side. The field region is wider than the coil. Which describes the induced emf? HL
Answer and reasoning
Constant while entering, zero while wholly inside, then in the same direction while leaving — A student who thinks the induced current always opposes the field predicts the same direction both times. Lenz's law opposes the CHANGE: entering, the flux increases; leaving, it decreases, so the induced emf reverses.
Rising steadily while entering, largest while wholly inside, then falling to zero while leaving — A student who thinks the emf follows the amount of flux has described the flux through the coil. While the coil is wholly inside, the flux is greatest but not changing, so the emf is zero.
Constant while entering, zero while wholly inside, then reversed while leaving — While entering, the flux rises at a steady rate, so the emf is constant. While wholly inside a uniform field the flux is constant, so the emf is zero. While leaving, the flux falls at the same rate, so the emf has the same size but the opposite direction.
Constant and in one direction for the whole time that any part of the coil is in the field — A student who thinks any motion in a field induces an emf picks this. While the coil is wholly inside a uniform field its flux does not change, so no emf is induced even though it is moving.
3 A flat square coil of 100 turns and side 5.0 cm moves at a constant 0.60 m s⁻¹ into a region of uniform magnetic field of strength 0.20 T. The plane of the coil is perpendicular to the field and its leading side is parallel to the edge of the field region. What is the emf induced in the coil while it is entering the field? HL
Answer and reasoning
1.2 V — A student who counts both sides perpendicular to the motion gets 2NBvL = 1.2 V. While the coil is entering, the trailing side is still outside the field, so only the leading side cuts field lines and has an emf.
0.60 V — While entering, only the leading side cuts field lines: the trailing side is still outside the field, and the sides parallel to the motion move along their own length. The leading side moves perpendicular to its length and to the field. Each turn has ε = BvL = 0.20 × 0.60 × 0.050 = 0.0060 V; for 100 turns ε = 0.60 V. Check with Faraday: the coil takes 0.050/0.60 s to enter while the flux per turn rises by BL², giving the same result.
0.050 V — A student who uses the total change of flux linked with the coil, NBL² = 100 × 0.20 × 0.050² = 0.050 Wb, without dividing by the time taken to enter gets this. The coil takes 0.083 s to enter, so ε = 0.050/0.083 = 0.60 V.
0.0060 V — A student who leaves out the number of turns gets BvL = 0.20 × 0.60 × 0.050 = 0.0060 V, the emf of a single turn. The 100 turns are in series, so the emf is 100 times larger.
Working While entering, only the leading side (L = 0.050 m) cuts field lines (the trailing side is still outside the field; the sides parallel to the motion move along their own length). ε = NBvL = 100 × (0.20 T)(0.60 m s⁻¹)(0.050 m) = 0.60 V. Check with Faraday's law: time to enter Δt = 0.050 m / 0.60 m s⁻¹ = 0.0833 s; ΔΦ per turn = BL² = 0.20 × 0.0025 = 5.0 × 10⁻⁴ Wb; ε = NΔΦ/Δt = 100 × 5.0 × 10⁻⁴ / 0.0833 = 0.60 V.
4 A bar magnet hangs vertically from a spring and oscillates up and down just above a flat coil. When the ends of the coil are unconnected, the oscillations die away very slowly. When the ends are joined through a resistor, the oscillations die away much faster. Which explains the difference? HL
Answer and reasoning
An emf is induced in the coil only once its ends are joined, so only then can the coil affect the magnet at all. — A student who treats emf and current as the same thing picks this. The emf is induced whether or not the ends are joined; what the complete circuit adds is a current, and it is the current that exerts a force on the magnet.
With the ends joined, the coil repels the magnet at every point of its motion, reducing its amplitude. — A student who thinks the coil always repels the magnet picks this. The force opposes the motion: it repels the magnet while it moves down towards the coil and attracts it while it moves up and away. A force that always repelled, depending only on the magnet's position, would remove no energy from the oscillation.
With the ends joined a current flows, and its force opposes the motion, transferring energy to the resistor. — An emf is induced in both cases, but only with a complete circuit does a current flow. By Lenz's law the current's magnetic force opposes the magnet's motion whichever way it moves, so work is done against it and the oscillation energy is transferred to internal energy of the resistor and coil.
The current takes its energy from the magnet's magnetism, so the weaker magnet oscillates less. — A student who thinks induction uses up the magnet picks this. The magnet does not lose its magnetism; the energy of the current comes from the oscillation's kinetic and elastic potential energy, through work done against the opposing magnetic force.
5 The current in a long coil is decreasing steadily. There is no magnet or other circuit nearby. Which statement about any emf induced in the coil is correct? HL
Answer and reasoning
An emf is induced opposite in direction to the current, making the current fall faster. — A student who thinks a self-induced emf always opposes the current picks this. It opposes the CHANGE: while the current is falling, the emf acts to keep it flowing, so it is in the same direction as the current.
An emf is induced in the same direction as the current, tending to keep the current flowing. — The falling current reduces the flux through the coil's own turns, so an emf is induced in the coil (self-induction). By Lenz's law it opposes the decrease, so it acts in the same direction as the current, tending to maintain it.
No emf is induced, because a coil's own changing field cannot induce an emf in it. — A student who thinks induction needs a separate magnet or coil picks this. The coil's own changing current changes the flux through its own turns, and Faraday's law applies to that change: an emf is induced in the coil itself.
An emf is induced whose size is proportional to the current, so it falls to zero as the current falls. — A student who thinks the emf depends on the amount of flux picks this. The flux is proportional to the current, but the emf depends on the RATE of change of flux. A steadily falling current makes the flux fall at a constant rate, so the emf is constant, in the same direction as the current, for as long as the current keeps falling steadily.
6 A rectangular coil of 40 turns measures 6.0 cm by 4.0 cm. It rotates at a constant 25 revolutions per second about an axis through its centre, parallel to its 6.0 cm sides and perpendicular to a uniform magnetic field of strength 0.10 T. What is the peak emf induced in the coil? HL
Answer and reasoning
0.24 V — A student who uses v = fr gets v = 25 × 0.020 = 0.50 m s⁻¹ and ε = 2 × 40 × 0.10 × 0.50 × 0.060 = 0.24 V. In one revolution a side travels 2πr, so v = 2πfr.
0.0096 V — A student who thinks the emf is set by the amount of flux gives the greatest flux linkage, NBA = 40 × 0.10 × 2.4 × 10⁻³ = 0.0096, which is in webers. The peak emf depends on how fast the flux changes, and occurs when the flux is zero.
0.038 V — A student who leaves out the number of turns finds the peak emf of one turn, 2BvL = 0.038 V. The 40 turns are in series, so the peak emf is 40 times larger.
1.5 V — Each 6.0 cm side is 0.020 m from the axis, so it moves at v = 2πfr = 2π × 25 × 0.020 = 3.14 m s⁻¹. When the plane is parallel to the field both sides move perpendicular to it, each with emf BvL, and these add around the loop: ε = 2NBvL = 2 × 40 × 0.10 × 3.14 × 0.060 = 1.5 V.
Working r = 4.0 cm / 2 = 0.020 m; v = 2πfr = 2π × 25 s⁻¹ × 0.020 m = 3.14 m s⁻¹. At the peak the two 6.0 cm sides move perpendicular to the field; each has ε = BvL = (0.10 T)(3.14 m s⁻¹)(0.060 m) = 0.0188 V, and the two add around each turn. Peak ε = 2NBvL = 2 × 40 × 0.0188 V = 1.5 V. (The 4.0 cm sides have no emf along them.)
7 A rectangular coil rotates at a constant frequency in a uniform magnetic field. A graph of the induced emf against time is a sine curve that is zero at t = 0, 10 ms, 20 ms, 30 ms and 40 ms, with maxima of +4.0 V at 5 ms and 25 ms and minima of −4.0 V at 15 ms and 35 ms. The coil is then made to rotate at 40 revolutions per second in the same field. What is the new peak emf? HL
Answer and reasoning
1.6 V — A student who reads the period as the 10 ms between successive zeros gets a frequency of 100 Hz and 4.0 × 40/100 = 1.6 V. The emf passes through zero twice per cycle; the period is 20 ms.
4.0 V — A student who thinks the peak emf depends only on N, B and A keeps 4.0 V. At a lower rotation frequency the flux changes more slowly, so the peak emf falls in proportion.
5.0 V — A student who thinks the peak emf is proportional to the time period finds that the period rises from 20 ms (50 Hz) to 25 ms (40 Hz) and gets 4.0 × 25/20 = 5.0 V. The peak emf is proportional to the frequency, so slower rotation, with its smaller rate of change of flux, gives a smaller peak emf.
3.2 V — The period is the time from one maximum to the next, 25 ms − 5 ms = 20 ms, so the original frequency is 50 Hz. The peak emf is proportional to the rotation frequency: 4.0 V × 40/50 = 3.2 V.
Working Time between successive maxima (5 ms and 25 ms) = 20 ms, so T = 0.020 s and f₁ = 1/T = 50 Hz. Peak emf ∝ f, so ε₂ = 4.0 V × (40 Hz / 50 Hz) = 3.2 V.
8 The graph shows how the magnetic flux Φ through each turn of a coil of 200 turns varies with time t. The coil is held at rest. What is the magnitude of the emf induced in the coil between t = 0.50 s and t = 0.70 s? HL
Answer and reasoning
0.40 V — The emf comes from the gradient of the flux–time graph. From 0.50 s to 0.70 s the flux per turn falls by 0.40 mWb = 0.40 × 10⁻³ Wb in 0.20 s, a rate of 2.0 × 10⁻³ Wb s⁻¹. With 200 turns, |ε| = N ΔΦ/Δt = 200 × 2.0 × 10⁻³ = 0.40 V.
0.080 V — 200 × 0.40 × 10⁻³ = 0.080 is N times the change in flux, with no division by the 0.20 s over which it happens. Faraday's law involves the rate of change of flux — the gradient of the graph — not the change itself. Divide by 0.20 s to get 0.40 V.
0.0020 V — 0.40 × 10⁻³ Wb / 0.20 s = 2.0 × 10⁻³ V is the emf induced in one turn. The graph gives the flux through each turn, and the emfs of the 200 turns in series add: multiply by N to get 0.40 V.
400 V — 200 × 0.40/0.20 = 400 treats the axis reading 0.40 as a flux in weber. The axis is labelled Φ / mWb, so the change is 0.40 × 10⁻³ Wb and the emf is 0.40 V. Read the unit and prefix off the axis label before substituting.
Working Between t = 0.50 s and t = 0.70 s the flux per turn falls in a straight line from 0.40 mWb to 0, so ΔΦ/Δt = (0 − 0.40 × 10⁻³ Wb)/(0.20 s) = −2.0 × 10⁻³ Wb s⁻¹ (the gradient of that segment of the graph). Faraday's law: ε = −N ΔΦ/Δt = −200 × (−2.0 × 10⁻³) = +0.40 V. Magnitude 0.40 V (2 s.f.).
9 A flat square coil moves at constant velocity, with its plane perpendicular to a uniform magnetic field, through a region of field that is wider than the coil. It starts outside the region, passes right through it and leaves on the far side. The graph shows the emf induced in the coil against time. Which conclusion follows from the graph? HL
Answer and reasoning
The field region is three times as wide as the coil. — The emf is +ε₀ while the coil enters (flux rising), zero while it is wholly inside (flux constant) and −ε₀ while it leaves (flux falling). Entering takes 0.20 s, so the coil's side is L = 0.20v. The emf is zero for 0.40 s, during which the leading edge moves from a distance L inside the region to the far edge, so W − L = 0.40v = 2L. Hence W = 3L.
The field region is exactly twice as wide as the coil. — This takes the 0.40 s of zero emf as the time for the whole field region to pass, giving W = 0.40v = 2L. But the flux is constant only once the trailing edge is inside, when the leading edge is already a distance L into the region. The zero-emf time corresponds to W − L, so W = 3L.
The flux through the coil is zero from t = 0.20 s to t = 0.60 s. — Zero emf means zero rate of change of flux, not zero flux. Between 0.20 s and 0.60 s the coil is wholly inside the field and the flux through it is constant at its greatest value, BA; that is exactly why no emf is induced.
The coil is outside the field from t = 0.20 s to t = 0.60 s. — Moving through a uniform field does not by itself induce an emf; the flux through the coil must change. From 0.20 s to 0.60 s the coil is wholly inside the field with constant flux, so the emf is zero even though the coil is moving in the field.
10 The diagram shows a metal rod PQ resting across two horizontal rails that are joined at their left-hand end by a resistor R. A uniform magnetic field acts into the page over the whole arrangement. The rod is pulled to the right at a constant speed v. Which statement about the induced current is correct? HL
Answer and reasoning
It flows in the rod from P to Q, driving the rod along the rails faster. — A current from P to Q would give a magnetic force on the rod to the right, speeding it up and creating energy from nothing. Lenz's law and energy conservation require the opposite: the current flows from Q to P, the force on the rod is to the left, and whoever pulls the rod does the work that heats R.
It is zero, because the uniform field through the circuit is steady. — A steady, uniform field can still give a changing flux: the flux is BA, and the area of the circuit enclosed by the rod, the rails and R grows as the rod moves. The changing flux (equivalently, the rod cutting field lines at speed v) induces an emf BvL and a current flows.
It flows in the rod from Q to P, so that end P is at the higher potential. — As the rod moves right, the area of the circuit and the flux into the page both increase. By Lenz's law the induced current produces a field out of the page inside the circuit, so it circulates anticlockwise: up the rod from Q to P, left along the top rail, down through R and back along the bottom rail. The rod acts as the source, and current leaves it at P, so P is its positive end.
It flows in the rod from Q to P and exerts no force on the rod. — The direction is right, but a current-carrying rod in a magnetic field always experiences a force. Here it acts to the left, opposing the motion, which is why a pull is needed to keep the rod moving at constant speed; the work done by that pull is the energy dissipated in R.
11 The diagram shows a bar magnet being moved towards a flat, closed circular loop of copper wire that lies horizontally below it. Which statement about the induced current, as seen by an observer looking down on the loop from above, is correct? HL
Answer and reasoning
Clockwise, so that the loop pulls the magnet in and makes its approach faster. — If the loop attracted the magnet, the magnet would gain kinetic energy while the loop also gained electrical energy — energy from nothing. Lenz's law says the induced current opposes the change causing it: the loop repels the approaching N pole, which requires an anticlockwise current seen from above.
Anticlockwise, and the person moving the magnet does work against the loop. — The N pole is nearest the loop, so the magnet's field at the loop points downward and the downward flux is increasing. By Lenz's law the induced current produces an upward field inside the loop, which from above is an anticlockwise current. Its upper face acts as a north pole and repels the approaching magnet, so the person must do work to push it closer; that work becomes the electrical energy in the loop.
There is no current at all, because the loop is not made of a magnetic material. — Induction needs a conductor and a changing flux, not a magnetic material. As the magnet approaches, the flux through the copper loop increases, an emf is induced and, because the loop is closed, a current flows — anticlockwise as seen from above.
Anticlockwise, with the energy for the current coming from the magnet's own magnetism. — The direction is right, but the magnet is not weakened by inducing a current. The loop's induced field repels the approaching magnet, so the person pushing it does work against that force; this work, not the magnet's magnetism, is the source of the electrical energy.
12 A rectangular coil rotates at a constant frequency about an axis in its own plane, perpendicular to a uniform magnetic field. The graph shows the emf induced in the coil against time; P and Q are two instants marked on it. Which statement is correct? HL
Answer and reasoning
At Q the plane of the coil is perpendicular to the field. — At Q the emf is zero, so the flux through the coil is momentarily not changing: the flux is at a maximum in magnitude. Φ = BA cos θ is greatest when θ = 0, that is when the plane of the coil is perpendicular to the field lines, and at that instant the sides of the coil move parallel to the field and cut no field lines.
At Q the plane of the coil is parallel to the field. — Zero emf does not mean zero flux; it means the flux is momentarily not changing. With the plane parallel to the field the flux is zero but is changing at its fastest, which is where the emf is greatest (P), not zero. At Q the flux is at its maximum and the plane is perpendicular to the field.
The flux through the coil at P is the same as the flux at Q. — The field is uniform, but the flux BA cos θ through the coil changes continuously as θ changes. At P the coil's plane is parallel to the field and the flux is zero; at Q, a quarter of a turn later, the flux is at its maximum. It is this changing flux that produces the sinusoidal emf.
The time from P to Q is half of one time period. — One time period is one complete cycle: from a zero, through the peak, the next zero and the trough, back to a zero. From a peak (P) to the next zero (Q) is a quarter of a cycle, a quarter of the time period, corresponding to a quarter turn of the coil.
13 The graph shows the emf induced in a coil that rotates at a constant frequency in a uniform magnetic field. The frequency of rotation is then doubled, with nothing else changed. What is the time period of the new emf? HL
Answer and reasoning
80 ms — Doubling the frequency does not double the time period. Frequency is the number of cycles per second and the period is the time for one cycle, so T = 1/f: doubling f halves T, from 40 ms to 20 ms.
20 ms — One full cycle on the graph, from a zero through the peak, the next zero and the trough back to a zero, lasts 40 ms. The emf completes one cycle per revolution, so doubling the rotation frequency halves the time period to 20 ms.
40 ms — Changing the frequency of rotation changes both the peak emf and the time period. The coil now takes half as long to turn once, and the emf completes one cycle per turn, so the period falls from 40 ms to 20 ms.
10 ms — This halves 20 ms, but 20 ms is only the time from one zero to the next — half a cycle. One time period is a full cycle, including both the positive and the negative half: 40 ms on the graph. Halving it gives 20 ms.
Working From the graph, one complete cycle (zero → peak → zero → trough → zero) takes 40 ms: the emf is zero at 0, 20 and 40 ms, but 0 to 20 ms is only half a cycle. So T = 40 ms and f = 1/T = 25 Hz. The emf goes through one cycle per revolution, so doubling the frequency of rotation to 50 Hz halves the time period: T_new = 1/50 = 0.020 s = 20 ms. (The peak emf also doubles, to 6.0 V, but that is not asked.)
That was your twenty minutes. Real practice on D.4 is past-paper questions marked against the mark scheme.
Paper 1A tests it as multiple choice; Paper 1B through data you have not seen before; Paper 2 with short answers and, at HL, extended responses. Look for the command words — outline, explain, compare, evaluate — and give exactly what each asks for.
Compiled from the IB Physics guide (first assessment 2025, updated November 2023) and our question bank · Specialist review in progress. How these pages are made · Free, no account ·