DP Science Cafe

IB Physics · Theme B The particulate nature of matter

B.2 Greenhouse effect

Summary to follow. 10 syllabus statements · 22 questions · about twenty minutes.

Compiled from the IB Physics guide (first assessment 2025, updated November 2023) and our question bank · Specialist review in progress · How these pages are made

In this topic — 10 syllabus statements
  1. Conservation of energy
  2. Black body
  3. Albedo (α)
  4. Variation of Earth's albedo
  5. Intensity
  6. Projected area of a planet
  7. Greenhouse gas
  8. Infrared radiation
  9. Greenhouse effect
  10. Enhanced greenhouse effect

Assessed in Paper 1A (multiple choice), Paper 1B (data-based) and Paper 2 (short and extended response). IB Physics guide (first assessment 2025, updated November 2023).

Learn

In preparation: 0 of 10 sections compiled and reviewed. The rest show key terms and common misconceptions from our question bank until they are.

Conservation of energy

Conservation of energy
Energy cannot be created or destroyed; it can only be transferred or changed from one form to another, so the total energy of an isolated system is constant. A planet is not isolated: it gains energy by absorbing solar radiation and loses energy by emitting infrared radiation. Conservation of energy then says that the power absorbed minus the power emitted equals the rate at which the energy stored in the planet's surface, oceans and atmosphere increases. Energy-balance calculations in climate physics apply this principle, usually per unit area, with intensities in W m⁻².
Energy balance and equilibrium temperature
A body is in equilibrium when the power it absorbs equals the power it radiates, so its temperature stays constant. The equilibrium temperature is the temperature at which this balance holds. For a planet treated as a single body: (1 − α)(S/4) = eσT⁴, where α is the albedo, S the solar constant, e the emissivity and σ = 5.67 × 10⁻⁸ W m⁻² K⁻⁴. With S = 1.36 × 10³ W m⁻², α = 0.30 and e = 1, T ≈ 255 K, about 33 K below Earth's observed mean surface temperature of about 288 K. The difference is due to the greenhouse effect.
Energy exchange between surface and atmosphere
In an energy-balance model with an atmosphere, the surface and the atmosphere are treated as separate bodies, each in equilibrium. The surface gains energy from absorbed solar radiation and from infrared radiation emitted downwards by the atmosphere (back radiation). It loses energy by emitting infrared radiation (σT⁴ per unit area for a black-body surface) and by non-radiative transfers: convection (rising warm air) and evaporation of water, whose latent heat is released in the atmosphere when the vapour condenses. The atmosphere absorbs much of the surface's infrared emission and radiates both upwards to space and downwards to the surface. Because the surface receives back radiation as well as sunlight, it is warmer than it would be without an absorbing atmosphere.

Students often think All the sunlight arriving at a planet is absorbed, so at equilibrium the infrared it emits must equal the total incoming solar power. In fact No. At equilibrium the total power leaving equals the power arriving, but the power leaving includes the sunlight scattered back to space. The emitted infrared equals only the absorbed solar power, (1 − α) times the incident power.

Students often think Greenhouse gases act like a lid that traps heat: infrared radiation cannot get out, so energy keeps building up while the gases are there. In fact No. Greenhouse gases absorb infrared and re-emit it, and the planet still radiates to space. After an increase in greenhouse gases the planet warms only until the infrared power leaving again equals the absorbed solar power; its temperature is then steady.

Black body

Black body
An idealised body that absorbs all the electromagnetic radiation incident on it, at every wavelength. At a given absolute temperature T, a black body emits the greatest possible power per unit area, σT⁴. It is the reference with which the emission of real surfaces is compared through their emissivity.
Stefan–Boltzmann law
The total power radiated by a body of surface area A at absolute temperature T is P = eσAT⁴, where e is the emissivity and σ = 5.67 × 10⁻⁸ W m⁻² K⁻⁴ is the Stefan–Boltzmann constant. For a black body e = 1. T must be in kelvin. Because P ∝ T⁴, a small percentage rise in temperature gives about four times that percentage rise in radiated power.
Emissivity (e)
The ratio of the power radiated per unit area by a surface to the power radiated per unit area by an ideal black surface at the same temperature: e = (power radiated per unit area)/σT⁴. It is a ratio with no unit, between 0 and 1 (e = 1 for a black body). Emissivity for thermal (infrared) radiation does not follow visible colour: snow and white paint have infrared emissivities close to 1. Treating Earth as a single body whose surface is at 288 K and which emits about 240 W m⁻² to space gives an effective emissivity of about 0.6.

Students often think Emissivity and albedo both describe how a surface reflects radiation, so they are the same property and only one of them needs to be used. In fact No. Albedo describes how much incident solar radiation is scattered back; emissivity compares the radiation a surface emits because of its own temperature with that from a black body. They enter the energy balance on opposite sides.

Students often think Emissivity is the power per unit area that a surface emits, measured in W m⁻². In fact No. Emissivity is the power radiated per unit area divided by σT⁴, the value for a black body at the same temperature, so it is a ratio with no unit.

Albedo (α)

Albedo (α)
A measure of the average fraction of incident radiation energy that a macroscopic system (a surface, a cloud, a planet) scatters back: albedo = total scattered power / total incident power. It is a ratio with no unit, between 0 (everything absorbed) and 1 (everything scattered); the fraction absorbed is 1 − α. Earth's mean albedo is about 0.30. Fresh snow has an albedo of up to about 0.9, and open ocean under a high Sun about 0.06.
Scattered power
In the definition of albedo, the scattered power is all the incident radiation sent back without being absorbed: reflection from ice, snow, water and land, and scattering by clouds, aerosols and air molecules. It is short-wavelength (mostly visible) solar radiation. It is distinct from the long-wavelength infrared radiation that a planet emits because of its own temperature.

Students often think Albedo is the fraction of incident radiation that a surface or planet absorbs. In fact No. Albedo is the fraction scattered back: total scattered power / total incident power. The fraction absorbed is 1 − α.

Students often think Albedo is the power reflected by each square metre of a surface, measured in W m⁻². In fact No. Albedo is a ratio of two powers, so it has no unit and lies between 0 and 1.

Variation of Earth's albedo

Variation of Earth's albedo
Earth's albedo is not fixed. It changes from day to day with cloud formation, because thick cloud scatters a large fraction of incident sunlight (often more than half) while cloud-free ocean scatters very little. It also varies with latitude: high latitudes have extensive snow and ice, and sunlight arrives there at low angles of elevation, at which surfaces, especially water, reflect a larger fraction. Seasonal changes in snow, ice and vegetation change it further. The value 0.30 is a long-term global mean.

Students often think Albedo is the amount of sunlight a place reflects, so it changes whenever more or less sunlight arrives. In fact No. Albedo is the ratio of scattered to incident power. Changing the incident power changes the scattered power in proportion; the ratio depends on the surface or cloud and on the angle of the rays.

Students often think Places at high latitude are further from the Sun, so the sunlight arriving there is weaker and more of it is reflected. In fact No. The difference in distance from the Sun between high and low latitudes (at most a few thousand kilometres out of 1.5 × 10⁸ km) is negligible. Latitude matters because of the angle at which the rays arrive and the snow and ice cover.

Intensity

Intensity
The power per unit area incident on (or passing through) a surface perpendicular to the direction of energy transfer: I = P/A. SI unit: W m⁻². For a source radiating power L equally in all directions, the intensity at distance d is I = L/(4πd²), an inverse-square law.
Solar constant (S)
The intensity of the Sun's radiation at the top of Earth's atmosphere, on a surface perpendicular to the rays, at the mean Earth–Sun distance: S ≈ 1.36 × 10³ W m⁻². It is measured by satellites above the atmosphere, so it is not the intensity at ground level, and it is not the Sun's total power output (its luminosity, about 3.8 × 10²⁶ W). Despite its name it varies slightly: by about 0.1% over the 11-year solar cycle, while the intensity actually received changes by about ±3% during a year because Earth's orbit is slightly elliptical. The equivalent quantity for another planet follows from the inverse-square law, S = L/(4πd²).

Students often think The factor of 4 in S/4 belongs in the solar constant itself, so the intensity at a planet's distance is L/(4πd²) divided by 4. In fact No. The solar constant is L/(4πd²): the intensity on a surface perpendicular to the rays, above the atmosphere, at the planet's mean distance from the Sun (about 1.36 × 10³ W m⁻² for Earth). Dividing by 4 gives S/4, the mean over the whole spherical surface, which is a different quantity.

Students often think The solar constant is the intensity of sunlight measured at Earth's surface. In fact No. It is the intensity at the top of the atmosphere. The atmosphere and clouds scatter and absorb part of the radiation before it reaches the ground.

Projected area of a planet

Projected area of a planet
A spherical planet of radius R intercepts the parallel rays of sunlight over the area of its shadow: a disc of area πR² perpendicular to the rays. The power intercepted is therefore SπR², even though the planet's total surface area is 4πR².
Mean incoming intensity S/4
The intercepted power SπR², averaged over the whole surface area 4πR², gives a mean incoming intensity of SπR²/4πR² = S/4. The factor of 4 is purely geometric: it combines the night side, which receives nothing, with the oblique angle at which the rays strike most of the day side. For Earth, S/4 ≈ 340 W m⁻², of which (1 − α)S/4 ≈ 240 W m⁻² is absorbed.

Students often think The solar constant is the intensity falling on every square metre of the planet's surface, so S can be used directly in the energy balance. In fact No. The planet intercepts SπR² but has a surface area of 4πR², so the mean incoming intensity is S/4.

Students often think Only the day side receives sunlight and it receives the full solar constant, so averaging over day and night gives S/2. In fact No. Dividing by 2 allows for night but not for the rays striking the lit hemisphere obliquely. The lit hemisphere has an area of 2πR² but intercepts only SπR², so the mean over the whole surface is S/4.

Greenhouse gas

Greenhouse gas
A gas in the atmosphere that absorbs and emits infrared radiation. The main greenhouse gases are methane (CH₄), water vapour (H₂O), carbon dioxide (CO₂) and nitrous oxide (N₂O). Nitrogen (N₂) and oxygen (O₂), which together make up about 99% of dry air, absorb almost no infrared radiation and are not greenhouse gases.
Natural and human origins of greenhouse gases
Each of the main greenhouse gases has natural sources and sources in human activity. CO₂: respiration, decay, volcanoes and release from the oceans; burning fossil fuels, cement production and deforestation. CH₄: wetlands and termites; livestock, rice paddies, landfill sites and leaks from the extraction of fossil fuels. H₂O: evaporation from oceans and transpiration from plants; irrigation and combustion (a small direct contribution). N₂O: bacteria in soils and oceans; nitrogen fertilisers, industrial processes and burning fuels.

Students often think Only greenhouse gases released by human activity contribute to the greenhouse effect; gases from natural sources are part of nature's balance and have no warming effect. In fact Yes. A molecule's absorption of infrared depends on its structure, not on its source. Water vapour from evaporation and methane from wetlands absorb infrared exactly as the same molecules from human activity do.

Students often think Greenhouse gases are pollutants: the dirty gases produced by industry, transport and farming, which cleaner air would remove. In fact No. Greenhouse gases are defined by their absorption and emission of infrared radiation. Water vapour and CO₂ are not toxic at atmospheric concentrations, and pollutants such as soot or sulfur dioxide are not among the main greenhouse gases.

Infrared radiation

Infrared radiation
Electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths longer than those of visible light, from about 700 nm to about 1 mm. Earth's surface, at about 288 K, emits almost all its thermal radiation in the infrared, with a peak near 10 μm; the Sun, at about 5800 K, emits mostly visible and near-infrared radiation. Each infrared photon carries less energy than a visible photon.
Photon energy
The energy of a photon is E = hf = hc/λ, where h = 6.63 × 10⁻³⁴ J s is the Planck constant, f the frequency, c the speed of light and λ the wavelength. The longer the wavelength, the lower the photon energy.
Molecular vibrational energy levels
The atoms in a molecule vibrate about their equilibrium positions (stretching and bending of bonds), and the energy of each mode of vibration is quantised into discrete levels. A molecule can absorb a photon only if the photon energy hf = hc/λ equals the difference between two of its energy levels. For greenhouse gases these differences are of order 10⁻²⁰ J, matching infrared photons: the bending vibration of CO₂, for example, absorbs strongly near 15 μm (photon energy 1.33 × 10⁻²⁰ J).
Absorption and emission in all directions
After a greenhouse-gas molecule absorbs an infrared photon, it is in an excited vibrational state. The energy is later released as infrared radiation, or shared with neighbouring molecules in collisions, warming the air, which itself emits infrared. The emission has no preferred direction: radiation leaves in all directions, so part of the energy absorbed from the surface is radiated back down towards the surface and part upwards towards space.

Students often think Greenhouse gases send the infrared they absorb back down to the surface, so all their emission reaches the ground. In fact No. Emission is in all directions. A layer of atmosphere radiates roughly equally upwards, towards space, and downwards, towards the surface.

Students often think Greenhouse gases form a layer that reflects the infrared radiation from the surface back down, like a mirror. In fact No. Greenhouse-gas molecules absorb infrared photons, moving to higher vibrational energy levels, and the energy is later emitted in all directions. Absorption followed by emission is not reflection.

Greenhouse effect

Greenhouse effect
The warming of a planet's surface above the temperature it would have if its atmosphere did not absorb infrared radiation. Greenhouse gases are largely transparent to incoming visible sunlight but absorb the infrared radiation emitted by the surface and emit infrared in all directions, including back towards the surface. The surface therefore receives energy from the atmosphere as well as from the Sun, and must be warmer in order to lose all the energy it absorbs. Without it, and with the same albedo, Earth's mean surface temperature would be about 255 K rather than about 288 K.
Resonance model of infrared absorption
The bonds in a molecule behave like springs, so the molecule has natural frequencies of vibration. When infrared radiation of a frequency equal to one of these natural frequencies falls on the molecule, the oscillating electric field of the radiation drives the vibration at resonance: the amplitude grows and energy is absorbed strongly. At frequencies far from the natural frequencies little energy is absorbed. The bending vibration of CO₂ has a natural frequency of about 2.0 × 10¹³ Hz, corresponding to infrared of wavelength 15 μm.
Link between the resonance and energy-level models
The resonance model and the molecular energy-level model describe the same absorption. The natural frequency f of a vibration in the resonance model corresponds, in the energy-level model, to photons of energy hf equal to the spacing of the vibrational energy levels. Both models predict that each greenhouse gas absorbs strongly only at particular infrared wavelengths.

Students often think Infrared radiation is more energetic than visible light because it is 'heat radiation', so it shakes molecules harder. In fact No. Infrared has a longer wavelength and lower frequency than visible light, so each infrared photon carries less energy (E = hf).

Students often think Resonance just means the molecule vibrates at the frequency of the radiation, so every frequency is absorbed equally well. In fact No. A driven oscillator vibrates at the driving frequency, but its amplitude, and so the energy it absorbs, is large only when the driving frequency is close to its natural frequency.

Enhanced greenhouse effect

Enhanced greenhouse effect
The augmentation (strengthening) of the natural greenhouse effect due to human activities that increase the concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. More of the infrared radiation from the surface is absorbed and re-emitted in the atmosphere, so less escapes to space at the existing temperature; the surface and lower atmosphere warm until the outgoing infrared power again balances the absorbed solar power.
Fossil fuels
Coal, oil and natural gas, formed over millions of years from the remains of organisms. Burning them releases carbon dioxide from carbon that was removed from the atmosphere long ago, and their extraction releases methane. The burning of fossil fuels is a primary cause of the enhanced greenhouse effect: the annual mean CO₂ concentration measured at Mauna Loa rose from about 316 ppm in 1959 to about 421 ppm in 2023.

Students often think The greenhouse effect is the result of human activity; without human emissions there would be no greenhouse effect. In fact No. The natural greenhouse effect, due to naturally occurring water vapour, carbon dioxide and other gases, keeps Earth's surface warmer than it would otherwise be. Human activity augments it; that augmentation is the enhanced greenhouse effect.

Students often think Greenhouse gases damage the ozone layer, and the hole lets in extra sunlight that heats the Earth. In fact No. Ozone depletion lets more ultraviolet reach the surface, which harms living things, but it is a separate problem. The enhanced greenhouse effect is due to increased absorption of infrared by greenhouse gases.

Diagnostic a bearings check, not a test

10 questions, one per part of the topic where we can. Answer them, then see which statements you own and which to read.

1 In a simple model of Earth's global mean energy flows, 340 W m⁻² of solar radiation arrives at the top of the atmosphere and 100 W m⁻² of this is scattered back to space by clouds, air and the surface. The surface emits 390 W m⁻² of infrared radiation. Earth is in energy equilibrium. What intensity of infrared radiation leaves Earth at the top of the atmosphere?

Answer and reasoning
  1. 340 W m⁻² — A student who forgets that the scattered sunlight is already leaving picks this, making the infrared alone balance all the incoming radiation. Then Earth would lose 340 + 100 = 440 W m⁻² while receiving 340 W m⁻². Only the absorbed 240 W m⁻² is re-emitted as infrared.
  2. 100 W m⁻² — A student who thinks the radiation leaving Earth is simply reflected sunlight takes the 100 W m⁻² scattered back as the outgoing radiation. Scattered sunlight and emitted infrared are separate streams; at equilibrium 340 = 100 + emitted infrared, so 240 W m⁻² of infrared leaves.
  3. 390 W m⁻² — A student who assumes the radiation leaving to space is the surface's own emission picks this. Earth would then lose 390 + 100 = 490 W m⁻² while gaining 340 W m⁻². The atmosphere absorbs much of the surface emission and radiates part of it back down, so less leaves to space.
  4. 240 W m⁻² — Conservation of energy at equilibrium: incoming 340 W m⁻² = scattered 100 W m⁻² + emitted infrared, so 240 W m⁻² of infrared leaves. The surface emits more (390 W m⁻²) because the atmosphere absorbs much of that emission and radiates part of it back down.

Working At equilibrium the power leaving equals the power arriving (conservation of energy). Leaving = scattered solar radiation + emitted infrared, so emitted infrared = 340 W m⁻² − 100 W m⁻² = 240 W m⁻². The surface emission (390 W m⁻²) is not the outgoing value: most of it is absorbed by the atmosphere, which radiates both upwards and downwards.

Read this in Learn

2 Which statement about the emissivity of a surface is correct?

Answer and reasoning
  1. It compares the power radiated per unit area with that of a black body at the same temperature. — Emissivity = (power radiated per unit area)/σT⁴, where σT⁴ is the power per unit area radiated by an ideal black surface at the same temperature. It is a ratio with no unit, between 0 and 1.
  2. It is the power radiated per unit area of the surface, so it is measured in watts per square metre. — A student who takes emissivity to be the emitted intensity itself picks this. Emissivity is that intensity divided by σT⁴, so the units cancel and it has no unit.
  3. It is the fraction of the incident radiation that the surface reflects, so it is equal to its albedo. — A student who treats emissivity and albedo as the same property picks this. Albedo describes scattered incident radiation; emissivity describes the radiation the surface emits because of its own temperature, compared with a black body.
  4. It depends on the visible colour of a surface, so white snow has an emissivity close to zero. — A student who judges emission by visible colour picks this. Snow reflects most visible light, but in the infrared, where it emits, its emissivity is close to 1.

Read this in Learn

3 Which of the following defines the albedo of a planet?

Answer and reasoning
  1. The total power absorbed by the planet divided by the total power incident on it — A student who confuses albedo with absorption picks this. This ratio is 1 − α, the fraction absorbed; albedo is the fraction scattered back.
  2. The total power scattered by the planet divided by the total power incident on it — Albedo = total scattered power / total incident power. It is a ratio with no unit; Earth's mean value is about 0.30.
  3. The power reflected by each square metre of the planet's surface, in W m⁻² — A student who treats albedo as an intensity picks this. Albedo is a ratio of two powers and has no unit; the reflected intensity is albedo × incident intensity.
  4. The infrared power the planet emits divided by the power incident on it — A student who thinks Earth's outgoing infrared is reflected sunlight picks this. Albedo counts only incident radiation scattered without absorption; emitted infrared comes from absorbed energy and is described by the emissivity.

Read this in Learn

4 Satellite measurements show that the mean albedo of the polar regions is much higher than that of the tropical oceans. Which is the best explanation?

Answer and reasoning
  1. Snow and ice cover much of the surface, and low-angle sunlight is reflected more strongly. — Earth's albedo depends on latitude. Snow and ice scatter a large fraction of incident sunlight, and at the low angles at which sunlight reaches high latitudes, surfaces (especially water) reflect a larger fraction than under a high Sun.
  2. Snow and ice reflect all of the sunlight that falls on them, whereas ocean water reflects none of it. — A student who pictures reflection as all-or-nothing picks this. No natural surface reflects all or none of the sunlight: fresh snow scatters up to about 0.9 of it and open ocean about 0.06. The high polar albedo comes from the large area of snow and ice together with the low angle at which the rays arrive.
  3. The polar regions are further from the Sun, so more of the sunlight that reaches them is reflected. — A student who explains latitude by distance from the Sun picks this. The difference in distance is at most a few thousand kilometres out of 1.5 × 10⁸ km, which is negligible, and distance would not change the fraction reflected anyway.
  4. The polar surfaces are colder, and colder surfaces reflect a larger fraction of the radiation on them. — A student who takes the coldness of snow and ice to be the cause of their reflectivity picks this. The fraction reflected depends on the material, its texture and the angle of the rays, not on temperature.

Read this in Learn

5 Which of the following is the solar constant?

Answer and reasoning
  1. The intensity of the Sun's radiation on a horizontal surface at ground level, averaged over a whole year at the equator — A student who places the solar constant at the ground picks this. The atmosphere scatters and absorbs part of the radiation, and a horizontal surface is not perpendicular to the rays; S is defined above the atmosphere, on a surface facing the Sun.
  2. The total power emitted by the Sun in all directions, which stays constant from one year to the next — A student who takes the name to mean a fixed property of the Sun picks this. The Sun's total output is its luminosity, about 3.8 × 10²⁶ W; S is an intensity, the luminosity divided by 4πd² at Earth's distance.
  3. The intensity of sunlight above the atmosphere, on a surface perpendicular to the rays, at the mean Earth–Sun distance — This is the definition. S ≈ 1.36 × 10³ W m⁻². It is measured by satellites above the atmosphere, on a surface facing the Sun, at the mean distance of Earth from the Sun.
  4. The mean intensity of the Sun's radiation averaged over the whole of Earth's spherical surface, day and night — A student who thinks S falls on every square metre of the surface, and so is also the mean over the whole surface, picks this. The planet intercepts SπR² but has a surface area of 4πR², so the mean over the whole spherical surface, day and night, is S/4; S itself is the intensity on a surface perpendicular to the rays.

Read this in Learn

6 The mean intensity of solar radiation incident on a planet's whole surface is S/4, where S is the solar constant. What is the origin of the factor of 4?

Answer and reasoning
  1. Half of the surface is in darkness at any instant, and half of the sunlight reaching the day side is reflected. — A student who looks for two reasons to halve picks this. The factor of 4 is geometric; reflection is accounted for separately by the albedo, as (1 − α)S/4, and Earth's albedo is about 0.30, not 0.50.
  2. The atmosphere absorbs or scatters three quarters of the Sun's radiation before it can reach the surface. — A student who links the factor to the atmosphere picks this. S/4 is the mean intensity at the top of the atmosphere, before any absorption; the atmosphere scatters and absorbs much less than three quarters.
  3. The planet intercepts power over its cross-section πR², but this power is spread over its total surface area 4πR². — The power intercepted is SπR², set by the planet's projected disc. Averaged over the whole surface area 4πR², the mean incoming intensity is SπR²/4πR² = S/4.
  4. The Sun's radiation spreads out over a sphere of area 4πd², so only a quarter of it reaches the planet. — A student who merges the Sun's sphere with the planet's sphere picks this. The 4πd² gives S itself; only a tiny fraction of the Sun's output, πR²/4πd², reaches the planet. The factor of 4 in S/4 is 4πR²/πR².

Working Power intercepted by the planet = S × (area of its projected disc) = SπR². This power is shared over the whole spherical surface, of area 4πR², so the mean incoming intensity = SπR²/4πR² = S/4.

Read this in Learn

7 Which statement about the main greenhouse gases in Earth's atmosphere is correct?

Answer and reasoning
  1. Each of them has natural sources as well as sources in human activity. — Methane, water vapour, carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide all have natural origins (wetlands for CH₄, evaporation for H₂O, respiration and volcanoes for CO₂, soil bacteria for N₂O) and origins in human activity (livestock, irrigation, burning fossil fuels, nitrogen fertilisers).
  2. Water vapour is not one of them, since it comes only from natural evaporation. — A student who thinks only human emissions count picks this. Water vapour is one of the main greenhouse gases; it absorbs infrared whatever its source, and human activity such as irrigation and combustion also adds some.
  3. Nitrogen and oxygen are the main ones, as they make up about 99% of dry air. — A student who equates abundance with effect picks this. N₂ and O₂ absorb almost no infrared radiation; the main greenhouse gases are CH₄, H₂O, CO₂ and N₂O.
  4. They are all pollutants produced only by industry, transport and farming. — A student who equates greenhouse gases with pollution picks this. Each main greenhouse gas also has natural sources, such as wetlands (CH₄), evaporation (H₂O), respiration (CO₂) and soil bacteria (N₂O).

Read this in Learn

8 A carbon dioxide molecule in the atmosphere absorbs an infrared photon emitted by Earth's surface. What happens?

Answer and reasoning
  1. It reflects the photon, so that the infrared radiation is sent straight back down towards the Earth's surface. — A student who pictures greenhouse gases as a mirror picks this. The molecule absorbs the photon and is excited; the later emission is in random directions. This is absorption and emission, not reflection.
  2. It moves to a higher vibrational energy level, and the energy is later emitted as infrared in all directions. — The photon energy matches the spacing of the molecule's vibrational energy levels, so the molecule is excited. The energy is later emitted as infrared (often after being shared in collisions) with no preferred direction, so part returns towards the surface and part goes upwards.
  3. It moves to a higher energy level and then emits the infrared downwards, back to the surface. — A student who thinks the re-emitted radiation is aimed back at the ground picks this. Emission has no preferred direction; roughly as much goes upwards as downwards.
  4. It splits into atoms, because the photon's energy is enough to break the molecule's bonds. — A student who carries over the ultraviolet chemistry of the ozone layer picks this. An infrared photon has energy of order 10⁻²⁰ J, far less than the energy needed to break a bond, so the molecule is only vibrationally excited.

Read this in Learn

9 According to the resonance model, how do greenhouse-gas molecules absorb infrared radiation?

Answer and reasoning
  1. Radiation whose frequency equals a natural frequency of vibration of the bonds drives large vibrations. — In the resonance model the bonds act like springs with natural frequencies. Infrared at a natural frequency drives the vibration at resonance, the amplitude grows, and energy is absorbed strongly; at other frequencies little is absorbed.
  2. Infrared photons carry more energy than visible ones, so they shake the molecules more violently. — A student who thinks of infrared as powerful 'heat radiation' picks this. Infrared photons carry less energy than visible photons; absorption depends on matching a natural frequency, not on the photons being energetic.
  3. The molecules vibrate at whatever frequency the radiation has, so all are absorbed equally. — A student who equates resonance with forced vibration picks this. A driven molecule does vibrate at the driving frequency, but the amplitude, and so the absorption, is large only near its natural frequency.
  4. Radiation at a natural frequency of the bonds makes them vibrate until they break, releasing the energy. — A student who links resonance with objects shaking apart, like a glass shattered by sound, picks this. An infrared photon carries energy of order 10⁻²⁰ J, far less than the energy needed to break a bond, so the molecule is excited into larger vibration, not broken; the energy is later emitted or shared in collisions.

Read this in Learn

10 What is meant by the enhanced greenhouse effect?

Answer and reasoning
  1. The greenhouse effect itself, which would not occur at all without the greenhouse gases released by human activity — A student who treats the greenhouse effect and the enhanced greenhouse effect as the same picks this. The natural greenhouse effect keeps Earth's mean surface about 33 K warmer than it would otherwise be; the enhanced effect is the human addition to it.
  2. Extra warming caused by holes in the ozone layer, which let more solar radiation through to the ground — A student who links ozone depletion with global warming picks this. Ozone depletion lets more ultraviolet reach the surface, a separate problem; the enhanced greenhouse effect is increased absorption of infrared by greenhouse gases.
  3. Direct warming of the air by the heat released when fuels are burned in engines and power stations — A student who thinks the heat of combustion causes the warming picks this. That heat is tiny compared with the effect of the CO₂ produced, which increases the absorption of the surface's infrared emission.
  4. The augmentation of the natural greenhouse effect by human activities that add greenhouse gases to the air — This matches the guide: the augmentation of the greenhouse effect due to human activities, which raise the concentrations of greenhouse gases, chiefly by burning fossil fuels.

Read this in Learn

Verify confirm before you go

12 more questions. Every wrong answer here is a real misconception, and you see why it is wrong straight away.

1 In a simplified model of Earth's global mean energy flows, the surface absorbs 161 W m⁻² of solar radiation and 333 W m⁻² of infrared radiation emitted by the atmosphere. It loses 17 W m⁻² by convection and 80 W m⁻² by evaporation of water; the rest of its energy loss is by radiation. At the top of the atmosphere, 239 W m⁻² of infrared radiation leaves Earth. The surface is in equilibrium and can be treated as a black body. Using σ = 5.67 × 10⁻⁸ W m⁻² K⁻⁴, estimate the mean surface temperature.

Answer and reasoning
  1. 183 K — A student who leaves out the 333 W m⁻² of back radiation, treating the atmosphere as a blanket that only slows losses, gets σT⁴ = 161 − 97 = 64 W m⁻² and T = 183 K. The atmosphere radiates to the surface, and in this model that input is about twice the absorbed sunlight.
  2. 306 K — A student who assumes the surface loses energy only by radiation sets σT⁴ = 494 W m⁻² and gets 306 K. Convection and evaporation remove 97 W m⁻² without radiation, so only 397 W m⁻² is radiated.
  3. 289 K — The surface absorbs 161 + 333 = 494 W m⁻² and loses 97 W m⁻² by convection and evaporation, so it radiates 397 W m⁻². σT⁴ = 397 W m⁻² gives T = 289 K, close to Earth's observed mean surface temperature of about 288 K.
  4. 255 K — A student who takes the radiation leaving to space as the surface's own emission uses 239 W m⁻² and gets 255 K. That is the temperature of a black body emitting what leaves the top of the atmosphere; the surface radiates more, because it also receives back radiation from the atmosphere.

Working Surface energy balance. Absorbed = 161 + 333 = 494 W m⁻². Non-radiative losses = 17 + 80 = 97 W m⁻². Radiated intensity = 494 − 97 = 397 W m⁻² = σT⁴. T = (397 / 5.67 × 10⁻⁸)^(1/4) = (7.00 × 10⁹ K⁴)^(1/4) = 289 K. (The 239 W m⁻² at the top of the atmosphere is not needed: it is the outgoing radiation from the surface–atmosphere system, not the surface's emission.)

Read this in Learn

2 A simple model of Earth uses a solar constant of 1.36 × 10³ W m⁻² and an albedo of 0.30. The atmosphere absorbs none of the incoming solar radiation. The atmosphere, at a temperature of 242 K and with emissivity 0.780, radiates an intensity eσT⁴ upwards to space and an equal intensity downwards to the surface. The surface is a black body. Using σ = 5.67 × 10⁻⁸ W m⁻² K⁻⁴, what is the equilibrium temperature of the surface?

Answer and reasoning
  1. 288 K — Absorbed solar intensity = 0.70 × 1360/4 = 238 W m⁻²; back radiation = 0.780σ(242 K)⁴ = 152 W m⁻². The surface radiates the total: σT⁴ = 390 W m⁻², so T = 288 K.
  2. 255 K — A student who does not count the atmosphere's downward radiation as an input to the surface balances σT⁴ against the 238 W m⁻² of sunlight alone and gets 255 K. The atmosphere radiates 152 W m⁻² down to the surface, and the surface absorbs it.
  3. 313 K — A student who thinks all the atmosphere's emission comes down to the surface adds both the upward and the downward 152 W m⁻², getting σT⁴ = 238 + 2 × 152 = 541 W m⁻² and T = 313 K. The atmosphere radiates in all directions; the upward part goes to space.
  4. 374 K — A student who uses S as the mean intensity over the whole surface gets σT⁴ = 0.70 × 1360 + 152 = 1104 W m⁻² and T = 374 K. The planet intercepts SπR² but has a surface area of 4πR², so the mean incoming intensity is S/4.

Working Solar intensity absorbed by the surface = (1 − 0.30) × (1.36 × 10³ W m⁻²)/4 = 0.70 × 340 = 238 W m⁻². Intensity radiated downwards by the atmosphere = 0.780 × 5.67 × 10⁻⁸ × 242⁴ = 152 W m⁻². Surface equilibrium: σT⁴ = 238 + 152 = 390 W m⁻², so T = (390 / 5.67 × 10⁻⁸)^(1/4) = 288 K. (Check: the atmosphere absorbs 0.780 × 390 = 304 W m⁻² of the surface's emission and emits 2 × 152 = 303 W m⁻², so it is also in balance, and 0.220 × 390 + 152 = 238 W m⁻² leaves to space.)

Read this in Learn

3 In a climate model, a planet is initially in equilibrium. The concentration of carbon dioxide in its atmosphere is then suddenly increased and afterwards held constant. Immediately after the increase, the infrared intensity leaving the top of the atmosphere is 4 W m⁻² less than the solar intensity absorbed. The albedo does not change. What happens next in the model?

Answer and reasoning
  1. Nothing changes: energy is conserved, so the planet's energy and hence its temperature must stay the same. — A student who reads 'energy is conserved' as 'the planet's energy stays the same' picks this. Conservation means the 4 W m⁻² absorbed but not emitted is stored in the oceans, land and air. The planet is not isolated, so its energy and temperature can change.
  2. The surface and atmosphere warm until the outgoing infrared again equals the solar intensity absorbed. — The 4 W m⁻² imbalance is stored as internal energy, so the temperature rises. A warmer surface and atmosphere emit more infrared, so the outgoing intensity rises until it again equals the absorbed solar intensity, and the planet reaches a new, warmer equilibrium.
  3. The planet gains 4 W m⁻² for as long as the extra CO₂ is present, because the gas traps the energy. — A student who pictures greenhouse gases as a lid that keeps energy in picks this. As the planet warms it emits more infrared, so the imbalance shrinks to zero; the gain does not continue once the concentration is held constant.
  4. The atmosphere warms because the extra CO₂ absorbs more incoming sunlight; the outgoing infrared is unaffected by CO₂. — A student who thinks greenhouse gases warm the planet by absorbing incoming sunlight picks this. CO₂ is largely transparent to sunlight, which is mostly visible; it absorbs the infrared emitted by the surface. The shortfall in outgoing infrared given in the stem is the effect of the extra CO₂, and the surface and atmosphere warm until the outgoing infrared again balances the absorbed sunlight.

Read this in Learn

4 A planet orbits a star at a distance where the intensity of the star's radiation, the equivalent of the solar constant, is 2.40 × 10³ W m⁻². The planet's albedo is 0.40 and its emissivity is 0.80. Using σ = 5.67 × 10⁻⁸ W m⁻² K⁻⁴, estimate the planet's equilibrium temperature.

Answer and reasoning
  1. 267 K — A student who multiplies by the emissivity instead of dividing, expecting a poorer emitter to be cooler, gets T⁴ = 0.80 × 360/σ and T = 267 K. A planet that radiates less at a given temperature must be hotter to radiate the 360 W m⁻² it absorbs.
  2. 282 K — A student who thinks the albedo already accounts for the surface's radiative properties leaves out the emissivity and gets σT⁴ = 360 W m⁻², T = 282 K. Albedo reduces the absorbed intensity and emissivity reduces the emitted intensity; both are needed.
  3. 298 K — (1 − α)S/4 = eσT⁴: 0.60 × 600 = 360 W m⁻² = 0.80 × 5.67 × 10⁻⁸ × T⁴, so T = 298 K. The emissivity below 1 means the planet must be warmer than a black body to radiate the same intensity.
  4. 422 K — A student who uses the full 2.40 × 10³ W m⁻² as the mean incoming intensity gets 0.60 × 2400 = 1440 W m⁻² and T = 422 K. The planet intercepts power over πR² but radiates from 4πR², so the mean incoming intensity is S/4.

Working Mean absorbed intensity = (1 − 0.40) × (2.40 × 10³ W m⁻²)/4 = 0.60 × 600 = 360 W m⁻². Emitted intensity = eσT⁴. Equilibrium: 0.80 × 5.67 × 10⁻⁸ × T⁴ = 360, so T⁴ = 360/(4.536 × 10⁻⁸) = 7.94 × 10⁹ K⁴ and T = 298 K.

Read this in Learn

5 Sunlight of the same intensity falls on every part of a region of ocean. Cloud covers 30% of the region's area, and the cloud-covered part has an albedo of 0.60. The cloud-free 70% has an albedo of 0.06. What is the albedo of the region as a whole?

Answer and reasoning
  1. 0.33 — A student who takes the simple mean (0.60 + 0.06)/2 = 0.33 picks this. The ocean receives 70% of the incident power, so its low albedo must carry more weight.
  2. 0.78 — A student who treats albedo as the fraction absorbed calculates 1 − 0.222 = 0.78. That is the fraction of the incident power the region absorbs; the albedo is the fraction scattered, 0.22.
  3. 0.30 — A student who assumes cloud reflects all the sunlight and ocean none takes the cloud cover, 30%, as the albedo. The cloud scatters only 0.60 of what falls on it, and the ocean scatters 0.06, so the albedo is 0.22.
  4. 0.22 — Weight each albedo by the fraction of the incident power it receives: 0.30 × 0.60 + 0.70 × 0.06 = 0.180 + 0.042 = 0.222 ≈ 0.22.

Working Albedo = total scattered power / total incident power. For incident intensity I on a total area A: scattered power = 0.60 × (0.30IA) + 0.06 × (0.70IA) = (0.180 + 0.042)IA = 0.222IA. Albedo = 0.222IA / IA = 0.22.

Read this in Learn

6 The albedo of a region of forest is measured from a satellite at the same time of day on two days, with the Sun at the same elevation. On day 1 the sky is clear and the albedo is 0.12. On day 2 thick cloud has formed over the region and the albedo is 0.48. Which conclusion is supported by these data?

Answer and reasoning
  1. The cloud absorbed and held the Sun's energy, and this trapped energy is what raised the albedo. — A student who thinks clouds work by trapping heat picks this. Albedo is scattered power over incident power, so absorption cannot raise it; the rise shows that the cloud scattered more sunlight back to space.
  2. The cloud scattered a larger fraction of the sunlight back to space, so less of it reached the forest. — The same incident intensity arrives on both days, and the scattered fraction rises from 0.12 to 0.48. The cloud scatters sunlight back to space, so less reaches and is absorbed by the forest: Earth's albedo varies daily with cloud formation.
  3. A region's albedo is a fixed property of its surface, so one of the two readings must be a measurement error. — A student who treats albedo as a constant picks this. The forest has not changed, but the system seen from the satellite now includes thick cloud, and Earth's albedo varies from day to day with cloud formation.
  4. More sunlight arrived above the region on day 2, so more was reflected, and more reflected means a larger albedo. — A student who thinks of albedo as the amount of sunlight reflected picks this. The Sun was at the same elevation on both days, so the same intensity arrived at the top of the atmosphere. Albedo is a ratio, scattered power over incident power, so it rose because the cloud raised the fraction scattered, not because more light arrived.

Read this in Learn

7 The solar constant at Earth, at a mean distance of 1.50 × 10¹¹ m from the Sun, is 1.36 × 10³ W m⁻². Mars orbits the Sun at a mean distance of 2.28 × 10¹¹ m. What is the equivalent of the solar constant for Mars?

Answer and reasoning
  1. 8.95 × 10² W m⁻² — A student who takes intensity to be inversely proportional to distance gets 1.36 × 10³ × (1.50/2.28) = 895 W m⁻². The power spreads over an area 4πd², so the ratio must be squared.
  2. 3.14 × 10³ W m⁻² — A student who writes the distance ratio upside down gets 1.36 × 10³ × (2.28/1.50)² = 3.14 × 10³ W m⁻², more than at Earth. Mars is further from the Sun, so it must receive less: use (d_Earth/d_Mars)².
  3. 1.47 × 10² W m⁻² — A student who thinks the factor of 4 belongs in the solar constant divides the correct 589 W m⁻² by 4. That gives the mean incoming intensity over Mars's whole surface, S/4, not the solar-constant equivalent.
  4. 5.89 × 10² W m⁻² — The Sun's power spreads over a sphere of area 4πd², so S ∝ 1/d². S_Mars = 1.36 × 10³ × (1.50/2.28)² = 589 W m⁻².

Working Intensity follows an inverse-square law, I = L/(4πd²), so S_Mars = S_Earth × (d_Earth/d_Mars)² = 1.36 × 10³ W m⁻² × (1.50/2.28)² = 1.36 × 10³ × 0.4328 = 589 W m⁻² = 5.89 × 10² W m⁻².

Read this in Learn

8 Earth is modelled as a single black-body emitter with an albedo of 0.30, ignoring the greenhouse effect. The solar constant is 1.36 × 10³ W m⁻². Using σ = 5.67 × 10⁻⁸ W m⁻² K⁻⁴, estimate Earth's equilibrium temperature.

Answer and reasoning
  1. 360 K — A student who uses S as the mean intensity on the whole surface gets σT⁴ = 0.70 × 1360 = 952 W m⁻² and T = 360 K. The power intercepted over πR² is spread over 4πR², so the mean incoming intensity is S/4.
  2. 255 K — Absorbed intensity = (1 − 0.30) × 1360/4 = 238 W m⁻² = σT⁴, so T = 255 K. This is about 33 K below Earth's observed mean surface temperature; the difference is the greenhouse effect.
  3. 303 K — A student who divides by 2 because half the planet is lit gets σT⁴ = 476 W m⁻² and T = 303 K. Dividing by 2 allows for night but not for the oblique angle of the rays on the day side; the correct mean is S/4.
  4. 206 K — A student who treats the albedo as the fraction absorbed uses 0.30 × 340 = 102 W m⁻² and gets T = 206 K. Albedo is the fraction scattered, so the absorbed fraction is 1 − 0.30 = 0.70.

Working Energy balance: (1 − α)S/4 = σT⁴. Absorbed intensity = 0.70 × (1.36 × 10³ W m⁻²)/4 = 238 W m⁻². T = (238 / 5.67 × 10⁻⁸)^(1/4) = (4.20 × 10⁹ K⁴)^(1/4) = 255 K.

Read this in Learn

9 Methane is released naturally from wetlands and also by human activity, for example livestock farming. Which statement about the absorption of infrared radiation by methane from these two sources is correct?

Answer and reasoning
  1. Only the methane from farming absorbs infrared; methane from wetlands is part of a natural balance. — A student who thinks natural greenhouse gases have no effect picks this. A molecule does not carry a record of its source; wetland methane absorbs infrared exactly as farm methane does, and it is part of the natural greenhouse effect.
  2. Methane from farming absorbs more strongly, because it is released with pollutants that trap heat. — A student who links greenhouse gases with pollution picks this. The infrared absorption of methane is a property of the CH₄ molecule, not of any substances released with it.
  3. Neither absorbs much, since carbon dioxide is the only gas in air that absorbs infrared. — A student who knows only CO₂ as a greenhouse gas picks this. Methane is one of the main greenhouse gases, and an additional methane molecule has a larger effect than an additional CO₂ molecule.
  4. Methane from both sources absorbs infrared identically, as absorption depends on the molecule. — A CH₄ molecule absorbs infrared at wavelengths set by its vibrational energy levels. These are the same whatever the source, so methane from wetlands and from livestock contributes to the greenhouse effect in the same way.

Read this in Learn

10 In a simple model, a greenhouse-gas molecule in its ground state has one excited vibrational energy level, 1.33 × 10⁻²⁰ J above the ground state. Infrared photons of wavelengths 10.0 μm, 15.0 μm and 20.0 μm fall on such molecules. Which photons can be absorbed? (h = 6.63 × 10⁻³⁴ J s; c = 3.00 × 10⁸ m s⁻¹)

Answer and reasoning
  1. The photons of 10.0 μm and 15.0 μm — A student who thinks any photon with at least enough energy is absorbed includes the 10.0 μm photons (1.99 × 10⁻²⁰ J). A transition between two levels needs a photon whose energy equals the gap, not exceeds it.
  2. Photons of all three wavelengths — A student who treats all infrared as 'heat' that greenhouse gases absorb picks this. Only a photon whose energy matches an energy-level difference is absorbed, so absorption happens at particular wavelengths.
  3. None of these infrared photons — A student who thinks greenhouse gases act on incoming ultraviolet sunlight, not on infrared, picks this. The 15.0 μm photon energy, 1.33 × 10⁻²⁰ J, equals the vibrational energy-level gap, so infrared of that wavelength is absorbed.
  4. Only the photons of 15.0 μm — E = hc/λ gives 1.99 × 10⁻²⁰ J, 1.33 × 10⁻²⁰ J and 9.95 × 10⁻²¹ J. Only the 15.0 μm photons have an energy equal to the gap between the levels, so only they are absorbed.

Working E = hc/λ. For 10.0 μm: (6.63 × 10⁻³⁴ × 3.00 × 10⁸)/(10.0 × 10⁻⁶) = 1.99 × 10⁻²⁰ J. For 15.0 μm: 1.33 × 10⁻²⁰ J. For 20.0 μm: 9.95 × 10⁻²¹ J. Only the 15.0 μm photon energy equals the energy-level difference, so only those photons are absorbed.

Read this in Learn

11 The bending vibration of a carbon dioxide molecule has a natural frequency of 2.0 × 10¹³ Hz, and carbon dioxide absorbs infrared radiation strongly at a wavelength of 15 μm. One student explains the absorption with a resonance model and another with molecular energy levels. Which statement correctly relates the two explanations? (h = 6.63 × 10⁻³⁴ J s; c = 3.00 × 10⁸ m s⁻¹)

Answer and reasoning
  1. They contradict each other: one treats infrared as a wave, the other as photons, so only one is valid. — A student who expects a single 'true' model picks this. The two descriptions agree numerically: the frequency that resonates with the vibration is the frequency whose photons carry energy equal to the level spacing.
  2. Only the resonance model is valid, since energy levels belong to electrons in atoms, not to bonds. — A student who ties energy levels to electrons alone picks this. Molecular vibrations are also quantised, with level spacings of order 10⁻²⁰ J, which is why they absorb infrared photons.
  3. Both are valid: the radiation's frequency is the natural frequency, and hf is the level spacing. — c/λ = 3.00 × 10⁸/15 × 10⁻⁶ = 2.0 × 10¹³ Hz, the natural frequency, so the resonance model predicts strong absorption. The photon energy hf = 1.33 × 10⁻²⁰ J equals the vibrational energy-level spacing, so the energy-level model predicts absorption at the same wavelength.
  4. Both are valid, but the level model predicts absorption at all shorter wavelengths, whose photons have more energy. — A student who thinks a molecule absorbs any photon with at least enough energy picks this. A transition between two vibrational levels needs hf equal to the level spacing, not greater, so photons of shorter wavelength are not absorbed by this transition. The energy-level model therefore agrees with the resonance model: strong absorption at 15 μm, not at every shorter wavelength.

Working f = c/λ = (3.00 × 10⁸ m s⁻¹)/(15 × 10⁻⁶ m) = 2.0 × 10¹³ Hz, equal to the natural frequency (resonance model). Photon energy hf = 6.63 × 10⁻³⁴ × 2.0 × 10¹³ = 1.33 × 10⁻²⁰ J, the spacing of the vibrational energy levels (energy-level model). Both models describe the same absorption.

Read this in Learn

12 At Mauna Loa, the annual mean concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere rose from about 316 ppm (0.032%) in 1959 to about 421 ppm (0.042%) in 2023. Burning fossil fuels now releases more than 35 × 10⁹ tonnes of carbon dioxide per year; volcanoes release less than 1 × 10⁹ tonnes per year. Before industrialisation, the large natural exchanges of CO₂ between the air, the oceans and living things were approximately in balance. Which conclusion is best supported?

Answer and reasoning
  1. Volcanoes are the main cause of the rise, because they release more CO₂ than human activity. — A student who believes volcanoes out-emit human activity picks this. The data contradict it: volcanoes release less than 1 × 10⁹ tonnes of CO₂ per year, against more than 35 × 10⁹ tonnes from burning fossil fuels. With the natural exchanges in balance, the small volcanic flow cannot account for the rise.
  2. The extra CO₂ has thinned the ozone layer, so more ultraviolet now reaches and heats the surface. — A student who confuses the enhanced greenhouse effect with ozone depletion picks this. CO₂ acts by absorbing outgoing infrared; ozone depletion, caused mainly by CFCs, is a separate problem.
  3. Burning fossil fuels is the main cause of the rise, and the extra CO₂ absorbs more of the surface's infrared. — Before industrialisation the large natural flows of CO₂ into and out of the air were approximately in balance, so a sustained rise needs a net addition. Burning fossil fuels adds more than 35 × 10⁹ tonnes per year, over 35 times the volcanic output, so it is the main cause. CO₂ absorbs infrared emitted by the surface, so a higher concentration absorbs more of it and enhances the greenhouse effect.
  4. At under 0.05% of the air, CO₂ is too dilute for the rise to change the infrared absorbed. — A student who judges a gas's effect by its proportion picks this. CO₂ absorbs strongly near 15 μm, where Earth emits strongly, so a rise from 316 to 421 ppm increases the infrared absorbed even though CO₂ is a small fraction of the air.

Read this in Learn

You're done here

That was your twenty minutes. Real practice on B.2 is past-paper questions marked against the mark scheme.

Paper 1A tests it as multiple choice; Paper 1B through data you have not seen before; Paper 2 with short answers and, at HL, extended responses. Look for the command words — outline, explain, compare, evaluate — and give exactly what each asks for.

← B.1 Thermal energy transfers B.3 Gas laws →

Compiled from the IB Physics guide (first assessment 2025, updated November 2023) and our question bank · Specialist review in progress. How these pages are made · Free, no account ·